Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 26.06.2025 09:07

Thank you.
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Russia can stop this any time.
Belmont Stakes 2025: Odds, horses, prediction, complete bettor’s guide - New York Post
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Can I know a love story of a medical student?
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
What’s next?
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Google's Find Hub finally gets AirTag-like UWB precision finding - Android Police
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Just in the last 5 years:
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
How do flat Earthers explain the existence of other spherical planets?
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Ukraine attacks Russian aircraft in far-reaching drone strikes - The Washington Post
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Let’s just make it real clear: